2022 Trademark Law Recap: NFTs, Distinct Branding, and the First Amendment

By cineramaJanuary 16, 2023NFT

NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS AND TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT: WHERE DOES THE LAW STAND? In Nike v. StockX, LLC , Nike filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against StockX, LLC, an online resale sneaker […]

Click here to view full article

Disclaimer

The statements, opinions and data contained on this site are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher of www.bitcoinisle.com. All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured primarily from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content and services, including but not limited to accuracy, security and updatedness. No part of the content and services that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice. Any use or reliance on our content and services is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyze and verify our content and services before relying on or using them. Participating in cryptocurrency activities is a highly risky endeavor, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any monetary decisions. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.

2022 Trademark Law Recap: NFTs, Distinct Branding, and the First Amendment

Tags:

Breaking News…

Previous PostHow Startups Can Use NFTs to Raise Funds in Web3

Next PostThe Metaverse: what does it mean for banks?

Disclaimer