Why Uniswap holders’ decision may have been at mercy of this institution

By cineramaFebruary 6, 2023Layer2

a16z could have been the group influencing most Uniswap proposals. The protocol’s founder had not answered to the allegation but UNI dropped 5%. Recently, Uniswap [UNI] holders who have […]

Click here to view full article

Disclaimer

The statements, opinions and data contained on this site are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher of www.bitcoinisle.com. All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured primarily from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content and services, including but not limited to accuracy, security and updatedness. No part of the content and services that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice. Any use or reliance on our content and services is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyze and verify our content and services before relying on or using them. Participating in cryptocurrency activities is a highly risky endeavor, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any monetary decisions. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.

Why Uniswap holders’ decision may have been at mercy of this institution

Tags:

Breaking News…

Previous PostDigital bank Revolut launches crypto staking for UK and EEA customers: Report

Next PostAssessing the role of Osmosis in ATOM’s near-term price journey

Disclaimer